Moldflow Monday Blog

Should we run Fill+Pack+Warp (FPW) or Cool+Fill+Pack+Warp (CFPW)?

Should we run Fill+Pack+Warp (FPW) or Cool+Fill+Pack+Warp (CFPW)?

I would argue there is a time and place for both. What is the question you are trying to get out of Moldflow?
Running a FPW is an isothermal, single mold temperature simulation. Every surface node and element are seeing the same mold temperature. As long as we understand that assumption, we can look at Warpage under that particular lens. This is a great starting point and a good benchmark to compare against when we start designing our cooling lines.
For my Moldflow Experts out there – Yes I realize that we preach that Cooling should be optimized before Packing and I agree with that philosophy. I also realize how most of our customers actually run Moldflow when I am not looking.
Running a standalone Cool can be faster to help you iterate/optimize or you can run a CFPW to compare your Warp predictions from your isothermal FPW. The Cooling portion would calculate the mold temperature based on your cooling lines, flow rate, mold material, and the plastic melt temperature.
While your CFPW warpage results will never be as good as your FPW warpage results, getting closer to these values means you have a well-designed cooling layout.
Ultimately CFPW will match reality more than FPW, but you have to start somewhere.

You can have a look at a FPW and a CFPW component

For more news about Moldflow and Fusion 360, follow MFS and Mason Myers on LinkedIn.

Previous Post
How to create your 3D mold blocks for Cool(FEM)?
Next Post
How to correctly measure warp on round parts?

More interesting posts

Check out our training offerings ranging from interpretation
to software skills in Moldflow & Fusion 360

Get to know the Plastic Engineering Group
– our engineering company for injection molding and mechanical simulations